Scientific Approach

The scientific approach for NABIR was developed with the assistance of a team of scientists and engineers from the national laboratories, and input from academic institutions and the private-sector R&D community. Three considerations guided development of the program. First, as summarized in the previous section "Legacy of the Cold War and DOE's Unique Set of Remediation Challenges," opportunities for applying bioremediation at DOE sites were identified, along with some of the unique remediation challenges faced by DOE. Second, reports from nine recent assessments of R&D needs for bioremediation were reviewed, and subsequent discussions were held with some of the participants (see "Bioremediation Research Needs"). Finally, related R&D programs in DOE and other agencies were evaluated to determine which R&D needs were not being met by the existing programs (see "Bioremediation and Related Programs in DOE" and "Bioremediation in Other Departments and Agencies"). NABIR is designed to fill these research gaps and complement other ongoing programs.

KEY THEMES OF THE NABIR PROGRAM


The scientific approach of NABIR is characterized by several key ideas which are highlighted and discussed below.

Fundamental research is required to advance scientific understanding of the biological, chemical, and physical processes important for natural and accelerated bioremediation. Research is needed in many disciplines, such as microbiology, structural and molecular biology, genomics, geochemistry, and hydrology and transport processes. But more importantly, interdisciplinary research involving two or more of these disciplines is likely to achieve breakthroughs in scientific understanding. Finally, fundamental research should be focused on the behavior of complex systems that include mixtures of contaminants and multiple organisms, and this research must account for the natural spatial and temporal variability of geologic environments.

Integration of scientific ideas across disciplines is essential for development of the knowledge needed to predict and optimize bioremediation rates and processes. An advance in any one aspect of bioremediation, such as development of microorganisms with enhanced degradative capabilities, is unlikely to make an impact unless other factors, such as how to introduce the microorganisms into the soil, are also improved. Scientific advances in many key aspects of bioremediation must be coordinated and integrated at every step of the way.


Overcoming the traditional walls that inhibit integration of disciplines is one of the keys to the success of NABIR.


Field research centers are the best vehicles for promoting and coordinating cooperation among research teams; identifying crucial fundamental, interdisciplinary research needs; achieving the integration described above; and focusing the research program on DOE's most significant problems. In addition, performing research at a contaminated site will facilitate the two-way transfer of information needed to ensure that the scientific results of this program will be integrated into site remediation strategies. Other opportunities, such as co-locating a bioremediation technology demonstration nearby, would allow for a host of synergistic interactions between technology development and fundamental research programs.

Access to R&D shared infrastructure will be required to advance measurement and diagnostic techniques for understanding, quantifying, and enhancing biotransformation processes and rates. Examples of the facilities required could include:

o Dedicated beamlines and end stations at the DOE synchrotrons, e.g., National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS), Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL), Advanced Light Source (ALS), Advanced Photon Source (APS) for applications in metal speciation, crystallography, and structural biology.

o High throughput sequencing facilities.

o Analytical chemistry facilities, e.g., gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS), high-pressure liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy (HPLC/MS).

o Advanced methods for imaging such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and high-resolution microscopy (e.g., confocal microscopes, electron microscopy).

In addition to instrumentation, a set of shared computational models and shared strategies for mathematically representing and visualizing biogeochemical processes will be required. Networks to efficiently link researchers to databases and models will facilitate rapid transfer of knowledge among the team and to other interested parties. One of the first tasks of the program will be to develop a set of specific recommendations on the nature and location of scientific infrastructure needed to support this program. Instrumentation and communication infrastructure needs will be evaluated on an ongoing basis, and recommendations will be made for developing new capabilities.

The goals of the research program and the interrelationships between the goals of program elements must be clearly identified. In the following sections, the research program is described in terms of program goals at three, five, and ten years.

Linkages to related research and technology development programs will be established and maintained to ensure that NABIR builds on knowledge gained from other programs, fills in key gaps in scientific understanding, focuses on DOE's most important environmental problems, and leverages funds and shares resources when possible. In particular, NABIR will work closely with OEM's Contaminant Plumes and Landfill focus teams to facilitate the seamless integration of knowledge between these complementary programs.

These themes will be implemented through the seven program elements shown in Fig. 3 and described below.

THE SEVEN PROGRAM ELEMENTS OF NABIR


The NABIR program consists of seven interrelated program elements:

o Biotransformation and Biodegradation

o Community Dynamics and Microbial Ecology

o Biomolecular Science and Engineering

o Biogeochemical Dynamics

o Assessment

o Acceleration

o System Integration, Prediction, and Optimization.

A schematic diagram illustrating the analysis and synthesis leading to selection of the scientific program elements for NABIR is provided in Fig. 4, and detailed supporting information derived from recent R&D needs assessments is provided in Table 2.

The rationale for selecting these seven interrelated program elements is provided below:

Biotransformation and Biodegradation. More knowledge is needed about mechanisms and pathways for biotransformation and biodegradation, especially for metals, radionuclides, and mixtures of contaminants. Moreover, the role of microbial consortia and how organisms work together to degrade or transform contaminants must be understood better.

Figure 3. A schematic diagram showing the seven program elements of the NABIR Program, the integrating role of the field research centers, and the partnerships to enable implementation of new bioremediation technologies.

Figure 4. Analysis and synthesis of NABIR Program needs.

Table 2. Bioremediation research and development needs as identified in recent reviews and addressed by NABIR Program Plan.

Table 2 (cont.). Bioremediation research and development needs as identified in recent reviews and addressed by NABIR Program Plan (continued).

Community Dynamics and Ecology. More knowledge is needed to understand the composition, structure, and function of the large number of organisms present in natural systems. Advanced molecular and biochemical methods should be applied to identify populations, evaluate evolution in response to exposure to contaminants, and understand the influence of a variety of environmental factors on biodegradation and biotransformation rates and processes. In addition, better understanding of the factors influencing the survival and effectiveness of introduced organisms needs to be developed.

Biomolecular Science and Engineering. The potential of molecular manipulation to enhance bioremediation remains untapped. To realize this potential, more information is needed to analyze genes, proteins, and regulatory elements of critical molecules for bioremediation. Knowledge of structure and function relationships is also needed to understand the enzymatic mechanisms for detoxification. Building on this foundation, organisms could be engineered with superior degradative capabilities. However, ethical, legal, and social issues associated with the development and utilization of engineered biodegradative organisms must be addressed to the satisfaction of the public and regulatory agencies before they can be used.

Biogeochemical Dynamics. Better methods are needed for measuring the in situ distribution of organisms with potential for biodegradation, and for understanding the environmental factors that control these distributions. In addition, the important role of interfaces as it affects the nature and rate of biogeochemical processes needs to be understood better, especially the role of solid-liquid interfaces, liquid-gas interfaces, and the interface between two immiscible liquids. Bioavailability of contaminants and nutrients is another key issue that must be better understood.

Assessment. Advanced and real-time measurement tools are required to understand and monitor the processes responsible for bioremediation and assessing how effective they are. Key needs include developing new methods for assessing biodegradation rates and activities, developing noninvasive or minimally invasive techniques for characterizing a site and monitoring loss of contaminants from the site, developing diagnostic techniques for interpreting measurements, and determining a scientifically defensible strategy for identifying bioremediation end points.

Acceleration. Better understanding of the factors that limit the rate of in situ bioremediation is needed so that effective methods for accelerating biogeochemical processes can be developed. Better methods should be developed for supplying nutrients and microorganisms for in situ bioremediation, and for increasing the bioavailability of contaminants. To achieve this, the underlying transport processes need to be better understood, innovative biostimulation and bioaugmentation methods as well as better methods for delivering acceleration agents to the subsurface should be developed.

System Integration, Prediction, and Optimization. More knowledge is required to predict and optimize the effectiveness of bioremediation. Mechanistic models that quantitatively describe biotransformation and biodegradation processes, community dynamics, and biogeochemical dynamics must be improved and then linked together to develop engineering models for field-scale design, optimization, and assessment of bioremediation. Systems to integrate and disseminate new information are also needed.

Close coordination and interaction among researchers investigating topics in these program elements will be required to overcome the traditional barriers to cross-fertilization and integration of knowledge and ideas. The field research centers described below, as well as information systems, shared models, and R&D shared infrastructure will be the major vehicles for achieving this interaction.

FIELD RESEARCH CENTERS


There is broad agreement among the R&D community about the need for dedicated research sites where the biogeochemical processes that contribute to bioremediation can be investigated. Field research centers will also be the vehicles for identifying applied research needs. NABIR will establish three field research centers where such site-based investigations can be carried out. The field research centers will be selected to address a range of hydrogeologic environments and contaminant mixtures that are important to DOE. The concept for operating these field research centers is illustrated in Fig. 5. The centers will support four types of activities:

1. Small-scale, investigator-driven experiments related to community dynamics of soil microbiota and ecology, biotransformation and biodegradation processes, the survival and effectiveness of bioengineered organisms, biogeochemical dynamics, new methods of assessment, and acceleration strategies.

2. Large-scale interdisciplinary assessment of the rates and processes influencing natural bioremediation.

3. Large-scale manipulative experiments where methods of accelerating bioremediation and the underlying scientific foundations can be evaluated..

4. Pilot-scale evaluation of manipulative methods of accelerating bioremediation.

Figure 5. Field research center concept.

In addition, samples of soil, sediment, groundwater, and biota will be made available for researchers performing laboratory experiments. Thus each field research center will offer the opportunity for iterative and synergistic laboratory and field-based research. The ability to test hypotheses derived from either field or laboratory-based research in an iterative manner will make this program unique.

Selected scientific investigators will be asked first to participate in the characterization of all aspects of the field site, including:

o Assessment of natural degradation and transformation processes

o Evaluation of community dynamics and microbial ecology

o Structure and function analysis of key bioremediative organisms

o Evaluation of the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the microbial community, contaminant distribution, hydrogeologic settings, and environmental factors.

Building on the characterization activities, concepts for accelerating bioremediation rates will be tested in the laboratory and, if successful, used for pilot or field-scale evaluation.

At each field research center, experimental work will proceed in the three phases illustrated in Fig. 6 and described below. Development of the three field research centers will be staged over the first four years of the program. The location of the first field research center will be selected in the first year of the program.

Phase I

The focus of Phase I, scheduled over the first two years, will be to

o Define programmatic criteria for the DOE field research center.

o Select, permit, and review data on the field site.

o Develop infrastructure support.

o Notify the scientific community of opportunities for research at the field research center.

o Initiate additional site and biogeochemical characterization of the site (to be continued in Phases II and III in parallel with field experiments).

Figure 6. Phase I, II, and III for the first field research center.

Phase II

The focus of Phase II, scheduled for years three through five, will be to

o Conduct interdisciplinary, multi-investigator experiments to assess the rates and processes influencing natural bioremediation.

o Conduct a large-scale multi-investigation experiment on accelerated bioremediation using existing approaches to accelerating bioremediation rates.

o Conduct small-scale, investigator-driven experiments including but not limited to community dynamics of soil microbiota and ecology, biotransformation and biodegradation processes, survival and effectiveness of bioengineered organisms, biogeochemical dynamics, new methods of assessment, and acceleration strategies.

Phase III

In Phase III, following year five, the focus will be to

o Conduct a large-scale, multi-investigator experiment on accelerated bioremediation using new, optimized acceleration methods developed from this program.

o Continue small-scale, investigator-driven experiments including but not limited to community dynamics of soil microbiota and ecology, biotransformation and biodegradation processes, survival and effectiveness of bioengineered organisms, biogeochemical dynamics, new methods of assessment, and acceleration strategies.

o Continue interdisciplinary multi-investigator evaluation of natural bioremediation rates and processes.

General attributes of sites suitable for the field research centers are summarized in Table 3. A discussion of the selection procedure for the field research centers is provided in the "Program Management, Partnerships, and Implementation Plan" section of this plan.

Table 3. Site selection criteria for field research centers.

STRATEGIES FOR SCIENTIFIC INTEGRATION


One of the major scientific challenges facing bioremediation is that its development for the solution of complex environmental problems requires an interdisciplinary approach. Successful bioremediation requires information from technical specialists such as microbiologists, hydrogeologists, geochemists, and engineers and nontechnical factors such as the public, land-use planners, and manufacturers. Overcoming the traditional walls between these disciplines is one of the keys to the success of NABIR.

NABIR will employ several strategies to achieve the integration of the scientific research activities:

1. The field research centers will be a major vehicle for integrating research activities and promoting cooperation among research teams. Databases containing a wide variety of site-specific information will be shared, and large-scale experiments will be jointly conceived, designed, and implemented by multiple investigators.

2. Scientific projects teams that include a variety of disciplines will be encouraged to submit proposals to the program. Proposals submitted by individual investigators will be integrated into larger programs involving a number of investigators. The peer-review process will be designed to facilitate formation of these teams.

3. The System Integration, Prediction, and Optimization program element will support projects to develop computational models that describe the dynamic interaction among microbial, geochemical, and hydrogeological processes. Participation of scientists from many disciplines and research projects will be required to achieve this goal. Engineers will be involved in scaling up these models to develop tools that accurately incorporate these processes but can also be used to design, optimize, and evaluate full-scale bioremediation efforts.

4. Through the use of shared R&D infrastructure, information flow will occur rapidly as new experimental data is gathered and interpreted.

5. Research projects that include investigators from more than one discipline will be favored over those involving only one discipline.

6. Regular scientific and public forums will be held where the results of research in progress can be shared among the research community and include technology developers and those involved in technology transfer. These will stimulate rapid exchange of ideas and help keep the project focused on the most important scientific issues.

Return to Contents

Previous Section

Next Section