The Legacy of the Cold War and DOE's Unique Set of Remediation


In situ approaches to restoration and containment, including bioremediation, are methods of choice over excavation and pump-and-treat because contamination is often widely dispersed, dilute, or otherwise inaccessible.


The U.S. Department of Energy faces environmental remediation and waste management problems resulting from over 50 years of nuclear weapons production. More than 10,500 individual hazardous-substance-release sites have been identified -- sites that must be safely managed until treatment and disposal options mature.

The volume, extent, broad distribution, and complexity of DOE's contaminated soils and groundwater pose a unique and formidable challenge: to develop scientifically sound characterization, remediation, performance assessment, and long-term monitoring technologies that are cost-effective and result in acceptable risk to human health and the environment. In situ approaches to restoration and containment, including bioremediation, are methods of choice over excavation and pump-and-treat because much of the contamination is widely dispersed in the environment, is present in relatively dilute concentration, or is otherwise inaccessible because of its depth or its location beneath structures.

Environmental restoration is complicated by the diversity of subsurface environments at contaminated sites across the DOE complex footnote . These sites are located in arid, non-arid, cold, and hot climates and include a diversity of geological settings and depositional environments with unique conditions that must be understood and managed for bioremediation or other restoration methods to be effective. In addition, DOE's history of developing, manufacturing, and managing nuclear materials and weapons resulted in environmental contamination with complex and exotic mixtures of compounds. Management practices over the 50-year period resulted from direct disposal of wastes into cribs and trenches or by deep injection and indirect contamination following the loss of integrity of landfills and leaking underground storage tanks (Fig. 2). The costs associated with remediating many of DOE's largest plumes of contaminated groundwater and sediments have not been determined, but estimates to clean up DOE's contaminant soils, sediments, and groundwater range from tens to hundreds of billions of dollars (DOE, 1995).


More than half of the DOE sites are contaminated with mixtures of two or more compound classes.


DOE created the Office of Environmental Management (OEM) in response to legal and ethical requirements to resolve this legacy of environmental contamination at 130 DOE sites. OEM's major responsibilities include waste management, environmental restoration, and relevant technology development. DOE must overcome myriad technical challenges to enable efficient waste management and environmental restoration at its sites. Scientific breakthroughs and technology development are important to enable implementation of cost-effective technologies that can meet the performance standards. OEM has implemented a new management approach that is designed to ensure that DOE's environmental R&D programs remain focused on OEM's most pressing remediation and waste management needs (DOE, 1994). Five major remediation and waste management focus areas have already been identified:

o Contaminant plume containment and remediation.

o Mixed-waste characterization, treatment, and disposal.

o High-level waste tank remediation.

o Landfill stabilization.

o Facility transitioning, decommissioning, and final disposition.

The NABIR program will include leaders from the contaminant plume containment, remediation, and landfill focus areas in an advisory capacity. It will coordinate its efforts to ensure the two-way transfer of information and knowledge.

Classes of chemical contaminants present in sediments and groundwater at more than half of all DOE facilities include fuel hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, metals, and radionuclides. Compound classes most frequently detected at DOE sites are metals and chlorinated hydrocarbons, radionuclides, anions, fuel

hydrocarbons, and ketones. Organic acids, phthalates, explosives, alkyl phosphates, complexing agents (i.e., EDTA, DTPA, and NTA), and pesticides are also significant contaminants at individual sites. More than half of the DOE sites evaluated by Riley et al. (1992) were contaminated with mixtures of two or more compound classes. The most common mixtures reported were metals and radionuclides. Co-disposal mixtures of compounds has resulted in modified transport and toxicity properties that can increase ecological or health risk. For example, complexation with ligands enhances the mobility of metals and radionuclides, alters behavior at mineral surfaces, and affects availability to microorganisms.

Figure 2. The DOE legacy of contaminant plumes: 2500 billion liters of contaminated groundwater and 200 million cubic meters of contaminated soil.


Successful In situ treatment of contaminant mixtures in diverse settings requires an understanding of the interrelation of the physical, chemical, and biological processes that effect chemical reactions.


Successful treatment of contaminant mixtures in diverse settings by in situ biological, chemical, or physical methods or a combination of these methods requires a fundamental understanding of the interactions and interdependence of physical, chemical, and biological processes that effect chemical reactions. Developing this basic understanding, as it applies to bioremediation technology development and performance assessment, requires integrated, interdisciplinary research.

Acquisition of this knowledge base must be accompanied by parallel advances in the development of effective performance assessments and advanced computational methods, identification of acceptable cleanup end points, and research in ethical, legal, and social impacts (ELSI). Researchers must identify and address stakeholders' issues and coordinate their efforts with other federal agencies and industry.

A full understanding of the natural processes involved in natural and accelerated bioremediation depends on the ability to build on laboratory experimentation by directly investigating phenomena in the field and conducting field experiments. Many of the scientific and technical results from a bioremediation R&D program on in situ treatment will also be applicable to waste management and minimization efforts such as the design and operation of bioreactors to treat a broad spectrum of dilute and concentrated waste streams from ongoing and past DOE operations.


footnote DOE is responsible for waste management and cleanup of more than 130 installations totaling approximately 7280 km2 in 30 states and territories. Collectively, these installations contain more than 2500 billion liters of contaminated groundwater and more than 200 million cubic meters of contaminated soil. Soils in approximately 5000 other properties are contaminated with uranium tailings (DOE, 1995).

Return to Contents

Previous Section

Next Section